MN Statute 147E registers naturopathic doctors effective July 2009 and mandates a work group to recommend measures to ensure MN Statute 146A effectively protects unlicensed healers and, also, to study naturopathic regulation laws in other states. All opinions welcome. In the spirit of the work group, where the unregulated and regulated healers concerns will find an equitable solution, we hope this blog will engender a friendly and meaningful conversation.

Saturday, May 24, 2008

Primum Non Nocere: North Carolina naturopathic doctors appeal to the state Medical Board for support


The motto of the North Carolina Medical Board is Primum non nocere, "Firtst do no harm", also the first principle of naturopathic medicine.

Now, the proponents of the North Carolina naturopathic doctor regulation bill appeal to the N.C. Medical Board for support:

"Naturopathic physicians and several medical doctors testified before a special committee of the Medical Board in support of the bill, which would set up a separate licensing board for the practice of naturopathic medicine, but only for people like Delaney who have been formally trained. Right now, there are only 22 naturopathic physicians in the state that would qualify.
The only opposition came from the N.C. Medical Society, which questioned whether that small a number of practitioners justifies a separate licensing board.
“We cannot support the bill because in our view, based on our experience over the years, the bill just comes up short,” said Steve Keene, general counsel for the Medical Society.Keene said the Medical Society is willing to work with naturopathic physicians to address the bill’s shortcomings. But that would mean one more delay for this long-sought-after legislation. And it opens the door to opponents in the alternative medicine community who are opposed to regulation."

This hearing is a pre-condition by the NC lawmakers to consider the licensure bill:

"Sen. Ellie Kinnaird, D-Orange, is sponsoring a bill in the General Assembly that would license naturopathic doctors, but lawmakers will consider it only if the medical board and the North Carolina Medical Society consider licensure for naturopaths and provide an official opinion as to whether it is a legitimate form of medical treatment."

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Medical society lawyer's "Based on our experience over the years, the bill just comes up short" sounds just like "I disagree with the language" from the diploma mill stand-ins we
have experienced over the years.
How about a reason or two?

Anonymous said...

That "bill just comes up short" is political speak for I am not going to support this but I will try to appear unbiased in public, IMHO.

Yes, specifics are needed.

I wonder what our Boyd Landry, the enemy of health freedom in America and the stooge of diploma mills is doing now? If I was him I would be doing damage control and trying to keep that big bonus he just lost for letting the Minnesota legislation get through.

There are now more and more regulation attempts happening in every state. It must be like a nightmare for him.

Bwahahahahahahahahaha.

Contributors

What is the source of 'Big Money' behind the ND Registration Bill?